Report

Help us improve this tool

Olympic Games Sustainability Calculator

Evaluate Olympic Games sustainability across ecological, social, and economic dimensions using the Olympic Sustainability Model.

O M T

Olympic Games Sustainability Calculator

Since 1992, the International Olympic Committee has treated sustainability as a core dimension of the Games alongside sport and culture. This calculator uses the Olympic Sustainability Model developed by Müller et al. (2021) to score each host city across three dimensions — ecological, social, and economic — on a 0 to 100 scale where higher is more sustainable.

The Three Dimensions

  • Ecological: New construction, visitor transportation footprint, and event size relative to venue capacity.
  • Social: Public approval, displacement of residents, and changes to rule of law during the event.
  • Economic: Budget overruns, public funding exposure, and long-term viability of venues after the Games.

Each dimension is scored from sub-indicators (0–100 each), averaged, then normalized so the three dimensions sum to the total sustainability score (max 100). Barcelona 1992 includes detailed sub-scores from the published model. For other Games, dimension scores are estimated proportionally.

Rankings at a Glance

Salt Lake City 2002 ranks highest at 71/100, benefiting from existing winter sports infrastructure and a relatively compact event. Sochi 2014 ranks lowest at 24.44/100, largely due to massive construction costs and poor post-event venue use. Paris 2024 scored 40/100 with an estimated 1.75 Mt CO₂ emissions — among the lowest carbon footprints for a Summer Games.

A score of 75 or above is considered the threshold for a fully sustainable Olympic event. For related ecology tools, see the Flight Carbon Footprint Calculator, the Car vs Bike Calculator, or the Kaya Identity Calculator.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which Olympic Games was the most sustainable?

According to the Müller et al. model, the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Olympics scored highest at 71/100. It reused existing venues and had a relatively small ecological footprint compared to Games that required extensive new construction.

Which Olympic Games was the least sustainable?

Sochi 2014 scored lowest at 24.44/100, with particularly poor economic performance due to an estimated $50 billion cost and many venues that became underused after the event. Rio 2016 also scored poorly at 28.89/100.

What is a good sustainability score?

A score of 75 or above indicates a fully sustainable Olympic event with effective management across ecological, social, and economic impacts. Most recent Games score between 30 and 50.

How is the total score calculated?

Sub-indicators within each dimension are averaged, then each dimension score is divided by 3 to normalize. The three normalized dimension scores are summed to produce the total (maximum 100). For example, Barcelona 1992: ecological 24.44 + social 20 + economic 11.11 = 55.56.

Are winter Olympics more sustainable than summer Olympics?

Not necessarily. Winter Games often have smaller visitor footprints, but Sochi 2014 proves that massive infrastructure spending can make a Winter Olympics the least sustainable event. Salt Lake City 2002 and Albertville 1992 rank well, but many winter and summer Games score similarly in the 40–53 range.

Tags

Olympic Games Sustainability Ecology Calculator Carbon Emissions Mega Events